What VERITAS tells us is ...

this greatest and hardly comprehensible miracle GOD represents, something they cannot fathom themselves? These ecclesiastics perform their office as if it were a bourgeois profession , along the lines of a tailor or a cobbler. The office of a priest or an ecclesiastic requires the above average talents of an open-minded, unprejudiced researcher, scientist or doctor. – Just how far removed is a nuclear physicist from a scientific explanation of GOD? He stands on the threshold of the CREATOR’S last secrets, but he does not have the courage to take the first decisive step towards this mystery. What VERITAS tells us is… (15) First of all there are people that tend to be particularly pessimistic. When these people happen to be scientists, they are of the opinion that it is their duty to express their pessimism in all scientific subject matter. They unfortunately confuse pessimism with objectivity, however: Pessimism is not objectivity . And then there is this great hurdle that makes it particularly difficult for materialistically minded people to believe in invisible things. These people experiment predominantly with physical things and they apply LAWS that only relate to physical matter. Nevertheless there is also a WORLD of SPIRIT next to the physical world. This WORLD is significantly larger and it also offers greater opportunities. The people living on Earth have hardly penetrated this world, because many scientists of renown are afraid to lay themselves open to ridicule by the public. I dare to suggest that these people are not of stout enough character , because they lack the courage face the TRUTH. • Scientists who are opinionated and who suffer from conceitedness are no true scientists in my view, if they do not have the courage to descend down into the abyss on behalf of science and research in order to find the pure TRUTH amongst the greatest of refuse. The world can do without them. What these people really achieved in spite of their titles and prominent names and what they are personally, that is to say, worth spiritually will be revealed to them in the hereafter, where all their conceitedness will no longer help them. A researcher who shies away from occult questions, in this case from unexplained phenomena, and who considers them ridiculous, pulls the rug from under his own research and therefore from under the TRUTH. Because: How are other researchers to synthesize insights based on knowledge that has been negated ? How can other researchers progress when their predecessors have shied away due to gutlessness or unwarranted timidity – or what is even worse, because they vented their sarcasm ? There exists an scientific formula in the hereafter that has absolute validity and it reads: “There is no such thing as impossible!”, because the impossible is already a positive concept, if it can’t be visible then at least invisible, the way suggestion can make something invisible, but really comprehensible. I am not a scientist, I am a philosopher. This is why I leave it up to those well versed with the subject to work out this formula mathematically and to insert the appropriate symbols. Professor Heisenberg has made some progress in that direction, but I am of the opinion that a correction is advisable. When a general, universal formula is established it may not be solely and exclusively