In the service of science - Part 2

But even the best mediums balk at the idea being treated like criminals by the sciences. The best mediums are also very sensitive when it comes to their honour. Even though they are exposed to ridicule and contempt - they mostly serve mankind in an unselfish way . • It will be possible for outsiders to gain better opportunities to orientate themselves once the university sciences respond to mediums with more understanding and with more confidence. Some academic scientists gained a certain reputation as psychologists or physicians but are still absolute nobodies in regards to all questions about the psycho-scientific doctrine , that is to say, are not familiar with the slightest demands spiritualism makes. The whole affair turns particularly difficult because it is relatively closely related to religion, ergo with the belief in God. Religion does not enjoy the best of reputation in the eyes of science, at least what the truth is concerned. This bad reputation is naturally also conferred to spiritualism . This creates prejudices that handicap the seriousness of research and investigation. The seriousness of this search for the truth is incomparably greater with informed spiritualists than with academic scientists. Not just academics are scientists, but also those that are deeply involved in the search for the truth based on their potential for self-experience. The Psychic Peace Circle continues to report its experiences June 1966 The consequence of the latest research results of the natural sciences is that it has already been verified that the Soviet Union’s Dialectic Materialism (DIAMAT) is a mistake. Communistic tendencies however still base themselves on this arbitrarily constructed philosophy, that is to say, communism’s foundation is built on aberrations, but one is still willing to allow its whole construction to stand on its shaky foundation in spite of it. This is the greatest betrayal of the truth! The Soviet Union is proud of its achievements in the fields of science and technology. Is the Soviet Union entitled to be proud of something that has already been refuted through international research results? It seems to me that international science doesn’t take drastic enough measures. Eminent and important research results must also be accepted by politics. It is unutterably important for mankind that no exceptions are made here. The fact that eminent scientific research results and eminent spiritual insights only have pertinence within circles of experts is an aberration, whilst the politics of individual nations and specifically their powerful leaders ignore it, because their power is and was built upon aberrations. The sciences cannot leave the responsibility for the welfare of mankind solely in the hands of politicians. Academic science does have the eminent obligation to deal with the mistakes made within governments. Spiritual insights must also play a greater role than before. Once it has been established that the old philosophies only led to mass murder, they must be replaced through new insights. In order to secure its survival and guarantee its continuance, mankind can demand this from science.