In the service of science - Part 2

Belief is a matter of trust . Just which truth can people really trust if this truth contradicts itself in many respects? The sciences should really leave religion out of the equation and concentrate more on the truth. Spiritualism is also a truth and one should seriously delve into it and try to explain anything that contradicts itself within it. Just why private pundits are not recognised by the public is completely incomprehensibly. They often do more than highly qualified academics. As academic scientists are unwilling to welcome the doctrine of the immortality of the human soul to the auditoriums of universities, private pundits must come to the fore that have studied this subject from the ground up and that are prepared to deal with this hot potato without taking the reputation of their own person into consideration. This field of knowledge is certainly not uninteresting and in regards to medical insights, very important. When trying to talk to a so-called average citizen in order to discuss this theme, one immediately encounters a considerable amount of resistance. This resistance is one of the greatest mistakes that people can actually make because: We are dealing with the most important part of one’s ego , namely one’s soul. • Without knowledge of the extended existence of his life, man is incomplete and also never objective enough in his considerations. Spiritual insights are only known to those that are interested in them and accordingly endeavour to inform themselves. The Churches do not provide adequate information about these insights, at least not more than what’s written in the Bible. What has spiritualism on offer in regards to the truth? • Spiritualism is not your usual religion, ergo not purely based on faith. It bases itself on experiences that can be repeated over again. Spiritualism is therefore a private experimental science of enormous importance. The way evidence is collected from individual phenomenon borders very closely to the methods of criminal investigations. Thousands of pieces of evidence are collected in order to convict the spirit of an “offence”. Every movement, every lead is examined and analysed with infinite care, logic and control in order to exclude all deceptions. A lot of it proves to be deceit, but far more turns out to be genuine phenomena of immortality and supernatural INTELLIGENCE. After examining all this evidence, the decision of the jury, ergo the circle participants that have to make a decision here, is: The spirit has been found “guilty”. Those that dispute this fact are either badly informed or not informed at all. If somebody asserts to have participated in numerous circles and that these circles were incapable of convincing him, he must have dealt with inadequate circles and they have to be completely excluded from constituting evidence. There are however circles that can withstand all scrutiny and deliver a plethora of evidence . The spirits make an all effort of not covering up their tracks. In addition to this are their own confessions: They explicitly explain what happened to them and where and how they now live. Academic sciences should not follow the lead of the Churches and simply ignore this.