The Delpasse-Effect

- 25 - But something else could indeed be possible: The stand-by wave in the brain of the sender could serve the purpose of encrypting the telepathic massage in a still unknown way an order to send it, transport-ready packaged, on its way. After arriving at the receiver’s brain, the code is decoded. It transforms back into a stand-by wave that the brain is able to read. We would then have the process that takes place in one brain in the Grey-Walter experiment distributed across two brains: A standby wave in the brain signals the command to switch the monitor on in the Grey-Walter experiment. The memory that contains the switch-on command is recorded at the same time. The switch-on command is thereby sent to the long term memory where it is stored. When required, a backward running impulse can retrieve the contents of the memory. This causes a new stand-by wave and it gives the signal to switch the monitor on. It could be a similar situation in telepathy experiments: The stand-by wave in the brain of the sender serves the purpose of encrypting the message in order to send it on its way to the receiver’s brain as an encoded packet. The stand-by wave in the brain of the receiver decodes the encoded packet and allows the brain to read the received message. In this context it also becomes clear why the stand-by wave has to develop in the brain of the receiver before he becomes conscious of the telepathic message. It is actually the instrument that is there to decode the message initially before the brain can read it and the receiver can become conscious of it. This stand-by wave is called subconscious stand-by wave. Such a concept connotes something completely new: The stand-by wave has up to now been linked with the mental processing of sensory perceptions for us (Professor Glees). It is supposed to be responsible for allowing a sensory stimulus to enter our consciousness. But suddenly a subconscious stand-by wave is also supposed to exist! It there a contradiction here? - Amazingly not. • Brainwave measurement have shown that a brain is certainly able to perceive something on a subconscious level. One could now assume that a perception that takes place below the threshold of consciousness, is simply a sensory stimulus that does not effect any activity within the brain. But this is not the case. • One has been able to verify that people are able to construct conscious associations on hand of subconscious perceptions. But as the perception remained subconscious, they have no rational explanation for the association. An example of this is an experiment Professor Hans Bender, University of Freiburg conducted with the Dutch sensitive Croiset. He was supposed to tell Bender something about a lady whose handkerchief he held in his hand. Croiset could only think of raisins - an association he could not find an explanation for. It turned out that this lady was born in Smyrna. But for Croiset, who had worked in a grocery store as a young man, the concept of Smyrna equated with concept of raisins. One could therefore assume here that the paranormal message that Croiset received was Smyrna. The association that produced this concept and that entered his consciousness was raisins. But as the message Smyrna obviously reached him via a stand-by wave, the association didn’t make any sense to him. • One must therefore imagine that there is also a form of thought activity that is tied to the standby waves and still doesn’t enter our consciousness in spite of it. This subconscious stand-by wave is a model image. This model image is supposed to convey to us how the complicated processes in the brain, those that become visible as paranormal

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjI1MzY3