In the service of science - Part 2

Our spirit guide ARGUN only just recently emphasised that every positive contact with the hereafter requires a high degree of trust . This trust ought not to be confused with gullibility. But where LOVE does not suffice, where harmony is lacking – and where mistrust replaces trust, doubt has the upper hand and only base lying spirits can at best make an appearance. These are however the spiritually dead and one can neither procure a good doctrine nor the truth from them. • We experienced it often enough that one single participant interfered with his negative thoughts to a degree where a contact was dissolved. Academic scientists are prepared to fulfil the religious demands of the medium in some cases these days. One tries to appease the medium in order to not upset it. But of what use is it if the participants hide a completely negative attitude, even if they externally show no signs of it, and willingly participate? – The world of spirit reacts accordingly. The Psychic Peace Circle continues to report its experiences March 1963 Psycho-scientific (esoteric) literature is very comprehensive. This literature contains a large selection of documentary reports that deal with one’s survival after one’s terrestrial death. One would therefore have to assume that collecting evidence in this respect has already ceased. One therefore really have to be quite surprised just how little of this truth is known. The general public therefore derides a reality that deserves everything but such defamation. We are dealing here with a dangerous backwardness in regards to spiritual knowledge that produced hatred between nations and in the final analysis, lead and still leads to all wars. Why does the kind of sophisticated reporting by the spiritual psycho-sciences produce such a lot of misunderstanding? • Almost all treatises about this subject are deliberately treated in such a way that they avoid the direct confirmation of all experiences because of some hidden agenda. The majority of the books that deal with occult or spiritual phenomena use words like: “It is assumed that…” - or: “The alleged manifestation of a deceased…” - or: “One is inclined to think that…” – or: ”One tries to explain…” etc. The readers immediately recognise that something interesting is described here without actually expressing an individual’s opinion. The final decision about it is left to the reader. But as the reader has in most cases even far less experience in this field than the author, the reader’s own opinion can only be a negative one. Professor Dr. Bender from the Parapsychological Institute in Freiburg/Breisgau in Germany some time ago held a lecture at the American Memorial Library in Berlin about these complex questions. The lecture was extremely well attended. But in spite of the many arguments, a “for and against” mentality prevailed and it ended up being the same situation one finds in pertinent literature. The visitors were left with having to make their own decisions. In one word: The sciences did indeed give a lecture, but if refrained from taking a direct stance in it. One is entitled to ask whether, faced with an enormous amount of evidence, this behaviourism is correct. – No excuses or individual’s opinions are appropriate in the direct sector of this psycho-science. We are