UFO-Contacts - Part 2

45 Governments have tried to disclaim Ufology up to now. This in turn falsely informed the world at large. To continue with maintaining this point of view is almost impossible these days. The existence of UFOs is incontestable. But one would like to abnegate the existence of extraterrestrials because they warn us and sharply criticise terrestrial mankind’s behaviourism. No human being on Earth likes to be told the facts. UFO-Contact (By H. V. Speer) February 1968 Whether in political life or in other fields of interest, it matters not, there will always be at least two different parties. Even the greatest truth will always have an opposition. This fact therefore also applies to so-called “Flying Saucers”. What is of particular shame is the abuse in the name of scholars’ opinions. It counts for nothing when the average citizen publicly announces his personal perceptions. But when a respected scholar publicly criticises and questions this citizen perceptions, the public respects his opinion a hundred times more. This is how the world at large is constantly falsely informed, because their belief in the omniscience of the scholar is virtually taboo. One talks about a religious belief in Saucers. It is however anticipated that all religious faith are on very shaky ground. The flush of success of scholars can put all truths in question and discriminate against them too. All obvious evidence is suppressed, concealed or ridiculed. One question arises over again, namely why do human beings always react so negatively, even when dealing with such a wonderful subject? In order to explain this situation even more clearly we include the opinion of a professor who published a comment in the journal “Feuerreiter” . This Dr. J. Meurers from Vienna means that: “Flying Saucers could also be falsely identified jet fighters.” He writes whole columns full of this argumentation. But “Flying Saucers” already appeared during biblical times, something everyone can read in the Bible. There were no terrestrial flying objects around in those days so that this mix up is not possible. It does however verify that this university professor is not sufficiently acquainted with the Bible, even though he does write for the “Feuerreiter” . He furthermore holds the view that terrestrial science already investigated all physical avenues so that secrets about speed and manoeuvrability no longer exist. This exposes the incredible arrogance of a scholar: Meurer says that the laws of nature are binding, even for extraterrestrial visitors. This presupposes that the sciences already know all the laws of nature. We feel sorry for any university that has professors like him on their staff. What are its students to make of this? Meurers literally cites the following opinion: “It might be best to stop talking about “Flying Saucers” and they will then disappear from conversations of their own accord.” To add anything to this would be meaningless. Our readers will be able to assess themselves how the world at large is negatively influenced. Dullness is not deflected by the scholar’s gown. Whether UFOs exist or not can probably be best assessed by us, because we have been entertaining