In the service of science - Part 3

19 our sensory spectrum. The microphone undoubtedly recorded ultrasonic waves , ergo voices that cannot be perceived by the human ear. This also applies to many spiritistic phenomena where one is dealing with gentle or inaudible raps. But the attempt to classify the human subconscious into physical frequencies should be left to academics. This assumption is illogical and absurd and also shows that their unwillingness to believe is defended with all available means – even with the most illogical definitions. What is of specific interest is the kind of microphone that was used. Should it be possible to produce even more sensitive microphones and tape recorder tapes, it would indicate a way of having even more success in this matter. Otherworldly entities have the opportunity to materialise their messages with the help of a medium with the right physical qualities. The high sensitivity of a microphone might help here if the available ENERGY does not suffice. The VOICE that is inaudible to the human ear can however be heard by a dog. This becomes apparent in the report by the Swede Jürgenson. His poodle Carino behaved in such a manner that there could be no doubt that he must have felt spoken to from INVISIBLE QUARTERS. The otherworldly VOICE actually whispered the words: “Oh Carino – d’Annuncio – do you hear me? – Carino, do you know me?” To make the subconscious of the Swede responsible for this is pure malevolence towards an august truth and unworthy of the world of science. The spiritual interpretation is absolutely more comprehensible and hits the nail on the head. Technology will assist us to verify the truth once and for all . The Psychic Peace Circle continues to report its experiences June 1968 Most people are of the opinion that academic science does not think it worthwhile to seriously deal with spiritualism . This is a mistake! – Academic science does not stand idly by, it tries to explore. But their methods differ from those applied by private research. Great mistakes are made and they are to the detriment of academic science. • The selection of the mediums is in itself is a decisive factor. Private spiritualism is in possession of a very comprehensive cache of experiences. The sciences will have and must gain these experiences a priory , as it does not want to be guided by private experiences. • The greatest dependability in regards to mediums only occurs after they have been under the strict control of a spiritual circle for years. A medium must also have a terrestrial master who trains, supervises and protects it. A good circle will however very rarely relinquish such a medium to science, particularly not if the protector and guide of such a medium is not consulted at all and completely eliminated. Academic does not concern itself with such protective measures. It simply goes ahead and investigates, even after it has been warned. This is why it is almost always a case where a medium